When does an excessively violent zombie flick from the 1970s permit itself to be
something more than a low grade horror movie?
I know it seems a bit counter-intuitive to begin this post describing the
movie’s retraction from B status, but for
as bad as some of the selections of The Killer B’s have been so far, I'd say it’s a far better start than most.
Admired both as a great cinematic achievement and a terrific
midnight fright, George A Romero’s Dawn of the Dead received almost a universal
appeal on its release backed by both critics and horror junkies alike. Even to
this day some 30 years later, the movie still has a marvelous showing, despite
the many remakes it has produced and itself being a sequel. Romero’s classic zombie piece consistently
remains towards the top of many lists concerning the greatest horror movies of
all time.
Our fascination with the living dead is nothing new, even at
this movie’s release. Dawn of the Dead
is in fact a sequel to Romero’s Night of the Living Dead released ten years
prior to this one and still we can dig deeper.
White Zombie, considered the first true zombie picture ever made, came
out in 1932. But even before this
so-called invention of the cinematic zombie there were precursors of the zombie
craze, most notably the stiff, muted somnambulist of The Cabinet of Dr.Caligari (1921). Dawn of the Dead provided nothing particularly
revolutionary or innovative in its story or zombie depiction compared to
previous movies of its kind. There’s not
much you can do actually. When zombies enter, it always becomes a struggle
for survival. And other than Danny Boyle giving zombies the ability to run in 28 Days Later, the creativity of one such creature is
limited. Despite the rather atypical and
unoriginal formula left for these movies, Romero’s second installment of the zombie
trilogy was a huge success. Many consider
Dawn of the Dead to be the best zombie movie ever made and I would certainly
agree. So to circle back to the initial question
posed, what makes Dawn of the Dead such a spectacular movie?
As everyone knows, a zombie movie typically demands a few
lauded human souls to go down with the countless number of zombies that perish. But these humans that fall—we do not merely
root for their deaths and finding pleasure in zombie seating flesh. There are movies where we do just that, and
this is not one of them. Unlike most zombie
movies, Romero shows an eminent care for his characters, treating them as
something more than just dead weight. Dawn
of the Dead is one of the few zombie movies where we know the character’s name
before he or she dies.
Our movie concerns itself with a small group of individuals
desperate for survival in a decrepit apocalyptic world where the dead now walk. And once again unlike most movies of this
kind, Dawn of the Dead is not just 90 minutes of mindless hysteria with people trying to flee for safety and killing herds of zombies in the mean time. In fact the majority of the movie finds this
group holed up in a shopping mall with little more than one large pane of glass
separating them from the living dead. In this context, the struggle for survival is more of a battle than a race.
No one is guaranteed survival— it is kill or be killed. Since the genre's inception it has always been a desperate and jarring flee for safety. Despite that, Romero still manages to throw plenty
of laughs into the mix easing the tension every so often. There might be something said about the
overall decision to set the movie in a large shopping mall. As we watch these mindless zombies walk around
the shopping center as if entranced by the ubiquitous elevator music, is there
something slightly familiar to be seen in general consumer behavior?
These laughable scenes come with delight, giving the
audience a break from what we and the characters both dread. Given such high praise for his meticulous
character study, Romero knew above all what his audience really wanted. Dawn of the Dead is far bloodier, more
violent and more disgusting than its predecessor. Now in color might I add. The first ten minutes, the most gruesome part
of the movie, is almost an exploitation of itself before we settle down with
the four survivors that make our movie.
With such high praise given on its release, Dawn of the Dead
to this day is one of the finest films ever made for this holiday season. Its age may show at times, especially with the
white make up of the zombies, giving it more of a B-movie feel and
classification. Whatever, then I will
say this: Dawn of the Dead is the gold standard of B-movies, from which every
zombie movie hereafter will try and out do with no avail.
YEA! orNAY!
YEA! or
Unusual for a zombie movie to have all that subtext about consumer behavior. I agree the make up was b-movie standard in places. Good review!
ReplyDeleteGreat movie, bad make-up- agreed. I haven't seen the last movie of the trilogy but that male up gets better.
Delete